注册
The Cefa Brief

评论洞察视角释义

主题

Regional Development

26 篇稿件

稿件

  • 视角Fiscal Policy

    Ohio levies a corporate income tax and collected 176 thousand dollars from it

    In the FY2025 collections file the corporate income tax runs from 32.9 percent of New Hampshire's state taxes to effectively nothing in Ohio, and four states have no such levy at all. The share is a poor guide to how a state treats capital, and it is used as a good one.

  • 释义Regional Development

    How the jobs in an economic impact claim are counted

    An announced job number is the output of a model, not a headcount. By the end you will know the three layers such a figure can contain, the difference between a job and a job-year, and what to ask before setting two claims side by side.

  • 视角Industrial Policy

    What transfers between places is the method, not the programme

    Spending on manufacturing plant rose from 75 billion dollars a year to 244 and then fell to 215, and no file held here says where a dollar of it landed. The structures that decide whether such spending works are published state by state, but nothing here records a single award, decision or outcome.

  • 释义Regional Development

    How state gross domestic product is measured and why the largest states dominate

    State GDP counts what is produced inside a state's borders in a single year, valued at that year's prices. By the end you will know what the ranking does and does not tell you about the people who live there.

  • 评论Infrastructure

    Three flat years of housing starts is a result, not a pause

    Starts have run at 1.42, 1.37 and 1.36 million units since 2023, below where the window opened in 2020. The dollars going into construction rose through the same period, and the dollars are what gets quoted.

  • 评论Regional Development

    Six states raise no income tax and no two replace it the same way

    Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming levy no individual income tax. The FY2025 collections file shows what each one leans on instead, and the answer is narrower and less uniform than the shorthand suggests.